![]() ![]() There was lack of accurate information because the investigation was of a case that happened long time ago, and hearsay or rumors were the only source of information. But these were the same sources he used in finding his perceived truth. The types of sources that Thomas Moore used he dismissed them as rumors and hearsay. ![]() The author portrays that Alan Grant was obsessed in proving Richard's innocence. Prejudice is portrayed in various instances in the book. The story takes a twist from being just a detective story or historical fiction to become a historical investigation that is performed by fictional characters in a spellbinding and enjoyable manner. ![]() The author has a unique way of unfolding the historical facts through banter and dialogue at times being humorous and fascinating subject matter making the readers to be glued to her story. Several of the characters are seen through Grant's eyes but he is not the only narrator of the story. The organization of the book is clear although it is from an omniscient point-of-view, writing from a third person making us see inside her characters and enabling us to understand them. Grant uses other people while investigating unlike his other escapades where he goes about almost single-handedly. ![]() The mystery cannot be solved like other cases where witnesses are interviewed and the crime scene is investigated, because Grant is bedridden with a broken leg and can only solve this mystery by reading history books and other documents. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |